Visit the FRN Affiliate Blogs!
Logo
  • Home
  • Assessment
  • Current Events
  • EMS 2.0
  • Legal
  • Politics
  • Research
  • Treatment
  • About Me
  • Disclaimer

Paramedic Student Ability to Determine Glasgow Coma Scale

Posted by Patrick Lickiss on May 31, 2012 in Assessment, General, Research | 6 comments

Tweet

As we talked about last week, the Glasgow Coma Scale is a useful assessment and triage tool in patients presenting with illness and injury. An article in the Emergency Medicine Journal looks at the ability of Australian paramedic students to correctly determine the GCS of several patients on a video test.

Here’s the abstract from PubMed:

Emerg Med J. 2012 Apr 13. [Epub ahead of print]

Should an alternative to the Glasgow Coma Scale be taught to paramedic students?

Winship C, Williams B, Boyle MJ.

Monash University, Department of Community Emergency Health and Paramedic Practice, Victoria, Australia.

Abstract

Background The accurate assessment of a patient’s conscious state using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is an important skill for paramedics as it may determine the patient’s initial and ongoing management. The objective of this study was to determine if undergraduate paramedic students from a large Australian University were able to accurately interpret a variety of conscious states.

Methods A prospective double-blinded observational pilot study requiring students to interpret the conscious state of four adult patients using the GCS by viewing a simulation DVD package.

Results There were 137 students who participated in the study, of whom 65% (n=87) were female students. The results demonstrated that undergraduate paramedic students were unable to accurately interpret a number of patient conscious states with only 20% and 37% of students able to accurately identify the GCS of patients 2 (GCS=12) and 3 (GCS=7). The motor component of the GCS appeared to be the component where the least accurate interpretation occurred, with only 47% of students being able to accurately identify the criteria that patient 3 displayed. Participants were however able to accurately interpret the GCS of both patient 1 (GCS=14) (86%) and patient 4 (GCS=15) (92%).

Conclusion This pilot study demonstrates that undergraduate paramedic students from an Australian university were unable to accurately interpret a patient’s conscious state if their GCS score was <14. These findings have provided academic staff with important information for considering alternative teaching and learning strategies and approaches in conscious state assessment in current paramedic curricula.

Obviously there are some short falls in the performance of the students.  I find it interesting, however, that the title of the article discusses finding an alternative to GCS. For better or worse, the Glasgow Coma Scale is a standard measurement.  If the students aren’t able to utilize it properly, perhaps a different method of teaching is warranted.  If an entirely different assessment technique is taught, those students would just have to learn GCS after getting into the field.

What do you think?

  • thePandemedic

    This study singles out Australian Paramedic students and then suggests there is a shortcoming in the student or educator. Why is the standard itself not questioned; GCS in this case? Where does fault lie? I would be interested to see a group of Physicians in the same trial. Time and time again I have seen Physicians disagree in a trauma bay the GCS of a patient. Does that mean the Physicians are incapable of utilizing GCS.

  • thePandemedic

    Does it mean that the standard is flawed and not equipped to properly help with patient assessment? Unfortunately GCS is used and must be learned. If the students are able to define the scale and all of its points we assume the problem is in their application. However If I give a Physician a GCS score of 10 and tell him to interpret it there are numerous combinations he can come up with. This then begs the question were the students off by a point and was that point in the same category as the other students. For example a score of 3-1-6 is drastically diiferent than 3-4-3. How did the students differ in the score as a whole as well as within each category. To simply report a score without a description of that score is flawed system. Give me a number and lets see how well you do at patient assessment is how I see this study as opposed to give me a description of this patient.

    • http://510medic.com 510medic

      You bring up a great point. If the GCS standard is flawed or not isn’t the question. If students aren’t able to learn the de facto standard the issue is with the learning environment. Drawing the conclusion that GCS flawed from the fact that paramedic students cannot properly execute it doesn’t make any sense.

      • http://510medic.com 510medic

        That said, I would love to see more research into options other than GCS.

        • thePandemedic

          I agree although my opinion is that it is flawed and so is the conclusion of the study. I think we should look at the same study with multiple populations such as nurses, medics and physicians alike. You are right, you cannot say it is flawed because medic students failed at utilizing it. I do question if there is a problem with the learning environment. Is it the educator or the standard? If GCS is flawed can it be properly taught and even more importantly porperly utilized? How do you measure whether it is flawed. The link I provided above suggests that the creators did not intend it to be used in our environment (Further research into this claim does need to be had). Furthermore I’m curious about whether GCS was created using evidence based research and if not does it equate to the Golden hour. It is a standard of care but at what point can we say a tool is a standard of care if it is not developed or created using evidence based research. This being said can we use one tool for all patient populations?

  • thePandemedic

    http://www.scancrit.com/2011/11/28/why-the-glasgow-coma-scale-has-got-to-go/

    The blog post above provides good information and good discussion regarding GCS that I think is at least worth looking at.

Follow Me

Follow me on FacebookFollow me on TwitterFollow me on RSSFollow me on E-mail

interventions

facebook fans

what is EMS 2.0?

EMS 2.0

Great reads

  • Ambulance Junkie
  • EMS Garage
  • EMS in the New Decade
  • Everyday EMS Tips
  • First Responders Network
  • Maddog Medic
  • MotorCop
  • NJ Dive Medic
  • Paramedic Pulp Fiction
  • Prehospital 12-lead ECG
  • Red Light Express
  • Rescue Monkey
  • Rogue Medic
  • Setla Films
  • The Happy Medic